I am a bit lost on this. Obviously, our stand point should be to oppose imperialism and support national liberation, but the rub comes in when we consider the reactionary political ideologies of Hamas and Hazbullah -- which also don't seem to care about the desctruction of life, as Hazbullah has gunned down civilians unapolgetically along with Israeli forces.
I don't really see it through the same lens. The masses who support Hezbollah are taking the right position: opposing imperialism. It's a sign of the weakness of the left that such a group is in the vanguard of the fight against imperialism. That doesn't mean Hezbollah isn't reactionary - or that it wouldn't crush revolutionary masses like the ayatollahs in Iran after 1979. But it does mean that communists need to first pose a real, concrete political alternative before launching attacks against such groups. And it does mean that those who are resisting Israeli occupation and aggression are fighting a just struggle.
The question of "civilians" is one argued about much. Are militarized Jewish settlers in the West Bank civilians? Or are they an extension of the Zionist state? They undoubtedly are agents of aggression, directly complicit in great crimes against the Palestinian people. These are interesting topics...
I think the Mao essay on the peasant movement in Hunan would be a good reference point for this.
The important thing is to remember that the main enemy is U.S. imperialism, that the fundamental contradiction is that between imperialism and oppressed people all over the world, and that, as Mao said, we should support whatever our enemy opposes and oppose whatever our enemy supports.
Oh, and the role of Zionism in the middle east, which is that of a "loyal Jewish Ulster" (to draw an analogy to the Irish Republican struggle) and that Isreal is waging a proxy war for U.S. Imperialism.
It doesn't matter if we agree with every policy, or even most. Hezbullah and Hamas are progressive, if for no other reason than they are participating in a broad anti-imperialist united front. It is good that Marxist-Leninist forces such as the PFLP are also helping to lead the masses in the united front, but that is not the main thing. The main thing is the struggle against the main enemy, U.S. imperialism and its regional proxy, Israel, and the struggle of the Arab people for self-determination with the palestinian struggle for national liberation in the vanguard.
Or one could argue that the Iraqi Resistance (which is united, nationalist - i.e., anti-imperialist- and patriotic, and led by the Baathists) is in the lead of the struggle in the region.
I think we can agree that U.S. imperialism (which uses Israel as its regional proxy) is the main enemy in the Middle East. I thinki we can probably agree that the mideast is the focal point of the fundamental contradiction. But who is leading the struggle? That's an important question, whether the Iraqi struggle for independence (led by the Iraqi national resistance) or the palestinian people's struggle for self-determination (led by a broad united front of anti-imperialist forces) is the vanguard of the struggle in middle east.
I don't see much distinction between the Palestinian and Iraqi anti-occupation resistence movements in terms of their leading roles. I think it can be viewed as different aspects of a broader struggle. That struggle may link up in a concrete way as things become more extensive - Syria could be a junction of sorts.
I also thought of the Hunan peasant movement article. Some were saying "it's terrible!" Certainly, the peasants were not good models of revolutionary discipline. They were in many cases motivated by revenge rather than the desire to liberate humankind. But Mao said "it's fine" and it should be upheld, in essence because it's right to rebel against reactionaries.
10 Comments:
Wow -- that's disgusting.
I am a bit lost on this. Obviously, our stand point should be to oppose imperialism and support national liberation, but the rub comes in when we consider the reactionary political ideologies of Hamas and Hazbullah -- which also don't seem to care about the desctruction of life, as Hazbullah has gunned down civilians unapolgetically along with Israeli forces.
I don't really see it through the same lens. The masses who support Hezbollah are taking the right position: opposing imperialism. It's a sign of the weakness of the left that such a group is in the vanguard of the fight against imperialism. That doesn't mean Hezbollah isn't reactionary - or that it wouldn't crush revolutionary masses like the ayatollahs in Iran after 1979. But it does mean that communists need to first pose a real, concrete political alternative before launching attacks against such groups. And it does mean that those who are resisting Israeli occupation and aggression are fighting a just struggle.
The question of "civilians" is one argued about much. Are militarized Jewish settlers in the West Bank civilians? Or are they an extension of the Zionist state? They undoubtedly are agents of aggression, directly complicit in great crimes against the Palestinian people. These are interesting topics...
That's true. The Settlers question is an interesting one, but I was talking more about the general populations.
Celt,
I think the Mao essay on the peasant movement in Hunan would be a good reference point for this.
The important thing is to remember that the main enemy is U.S. imperialism, that the fundamental contradiction is that between imperialism and oppressed people all over the world, and that, as Mao said, we should support whatever our enemy opposes and oppose whatever our enemy supports.
Oh, and the role of Zionism in the middle east, which is that of a "loyal Jewish Ulster" (to draw an analogy to the Irish Republican struggle) and that Isreal is waging a proxy war for U.S. Imperialism.
It doesn't matter if we agree with every policy, or even most. Hezbullah and Hamas are progressive, if for no other reason than they are participating in a broad anti-imperialist united front. It is good that Marxist-Leninist forces such as the PFLP are also helping to lead the masses in the united front, but that is not the main thing. The main thing is the struggle against the main enemy, U.S. imperialism and its regional proxy, Israel, and the struggle of the Arab people for self-determination with the palestinian struggle for national liberation in the vanguard.
Or one could argue that the Iraqi Resistance (which is united, nationalist - i.e., anti-imperialist- and patriotic, and led by the Baathists) is in the lead of the struggle in the region.
I think we can agree that U.S. imperialism (which uses Israel as its regional proxy) is the main enemy in the Middle East. I thinki we can probably agree that the mideast is the focal point of the fundamental contradiction. But who is leading the struggle? That's an important question, whether the Iraqi struggle for independence (led by the Iraqi national resistance) or the palestinian people's struggle for self-determination (led by a broad united front of anti-imperialist forces) is the vanguard of the struggle in middle east.
What do people think?
I don't see much distinction between the Palestinian and Iraqi anti-occupation resistence movements in terms of their leading roles. I think it can be viewed as different aspects of a broader struggle. That struggle may link up in a concrete way as things become more extensive - Syria could be a junction of sorts.
I also thought of the Hunan peasant movement article. Some were saying "it's terrible!" Certainly, the peasants were not good models of revolutionary discipline. They were in many cases motivated by revenge rather than the desire to liberate humankind. But Mao said "it's fine" and it should be upheld, in essence because it's right to rebel against reactionaries.
You guys might also like to check out this interview which I think sheds some light on the issue.
2015-10-15 xiaozhengm
Coach Factory Online Outlet Cheap Purses
cheap ugg boots
celine bag
Jordan Retro 13 Pink And Grey
michael kors outlet
Michael Kors Handbags Factory Outlet
Toms Shoes Sale Clearance
coach factory outlet
nike trainers
uggs on sale
Authentic Louis Vuitton Monogram Handbag
michael kors bags
ugg boots sale
michael kors outlet
Ray Ban Outlet Store Online
canada goose jackets
louis vuitton outlet stores
ugg boots on sale
michael kors outlet
michael kors bags
Louis Vuitton Bags Original
ugg boots australia
michale kors outlet
oakley sunglasses,oakley vault,prescription sunglasses,polarized sunglasses,aviator sunglasses,spy sunglasses,oakleys,oakley canada,cheap oakley sunglasses,oakley frogskins,oakley holbrook,cheap sunglasses,wayfarer sunglasses,oakley standard issue,fake oakleys,oakley glasses,oakley.com,oakley prescription glasses,oakley goggles,sunglasses for men,oakley gascan,oakley store,oakleys sunglasses
Air Jordan 6 Cigar
Michael Kors Outlet Sale Online Store
michael kors uk
Discount Clearance Coach Outlet Handbags
Abercrombie and Fitch Striped Shirts
ugg boots
Michael Kors Outlet Online USA Stores
abercrombie and fitch
tory burch sale
Michael Kors Outlet Discount Purses Online
mulberry handbags
tory burch outlet online
reebok shoes
football shirts
true religion jeans
ferragamo shoes sale
mont blanc pens
nike roshe run shoes
mulberry handbags sale
ugg sale
coach outlet
hermes bags
nike outlet store online
gucci outlet online
ray ban sunglasses sale
coach outlet store
ugg boots clearance
louis vuitton bags cheap
true religion outlet
toms shoes
uggs outlet
ugg outlet store
michael kors outlet clearance
ugg boots clearance
adidas nmd runner
louis vuitton
lebron james shoes
ferragamo shoes
uggs clearance
uggs outlet
ray-ban sunglasses
nike air max 90
ralph lauren femme
reebok trainers
yeezy boost 350
czq20160825
Post a Comment
<< Home